IGT 4/27/12: Mets at Rockies (Schwinden/Pomeranz)

nmigliore · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:08 am

MetFan29 wrote:

The Broncos have 2 touchdowns (one with an 2 point conversion) and a field goal.

The Jets have a touchdown (missed extra point) and a field goal.

It's all Tim Tebow's fault.

northway · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:16 am

This is hilarious.

MetFan29 · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:19 am

"Do the mets have a tying run inning in them? Why not..." Gary shouldn't of said that as Keith is already cold.

Hilltop · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:25 am

Is it just me or have the Rockies seemed to have pounded us in the last few years?

MetFan29 · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:30 am

Hilltop wrote:

Is it just me or have the Rockies seemed to have pounded us in the last few years?

I think Mets are 29-46 at Coors Field or some crazy number like that.

nmigliore · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:31 am

Well that was ugly. So happy it's over.

I really hope the Mets address their rotation depth soon; even if Schwinden turns out okay, you can't have someone like Jeremy Hefner or Garrett Olson as your next best starter if someone goes down.

And no, Chris Young shouldn't count.

northway · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:33 am

Again: this is what I ment by unmitigated disaster. It's really unclear where the innings are going to come from.

nmigliore · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2012 12:42 am

Quote:

Adam Rubin ‏ @AdamRubinESPN Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Terry Collins said he doesn't need a fresh bullpen arm from AAA. He also complimented Acosta and Parnell's body of work.

So yeah, forget the Schwinden demotion scenario.

NeverGiveIn · **Joined:** Sat Feb 23, 2008 10:32 pm **Posts:** 2055

nmigliore wrote:

MetFan29 wrote:

The Broncos have 2 touchdowns (one with an 2 point conversion) and a field goal.

The Jets have a touchdown (missed extra point) and a field goal.

It's all Tim Tebow's fault.

whos to say the mets are the jets here? In fact comparing them to the jets is a slap in the face to this team.

However I do realize you were having some fun. I'd rather the mets be the Panthers. I'll do anything not to have this team compared to the NY Tebows!

Now if you excuse me, I need to clean myself after taking a dump in the tebowing position!

R Nitelight · **Joined:** Mon Sep 18, 2006 6:12 pm **Posts:** 32524

It was 2-1 when I left.....

benderguy1 · **Joined:** Thu Sep 21, 2006 10:09 am **Posts:** 3269

R Nitelight wrote:

It was 2-1 when I left.....

You didn't miss anything, we still lost by a 2-1 ratio.

jdawginsc · **Posted:** Sat Apr 28, 2012 11:16 am

nmigliore wrote:

Well that was ugly. So happy it's over.

I really hope the Mets address their rotation depth soon; even if Schwinden turns out okay, you can't have someone like Jeremy Hefner or Garrett Olson as your next best starter if someone goes down.

And no, Chris Young shouldn't count.

Last thing we should worry about is getting another, tripe-y type-y guy with Hefner, Young and Olsen. Other people's weeds are no better than ours. Personally, I think this is enough depth for now until the youngsters start becoming a part of the conversation (and Young could be an added bonus).

This is what I meant with the cascade effect of losing Pelf. Honestly, this may not be popular, but it makes more sense to flip Batista (if you are going to keep him) with Schwinden, and let Miguel gut out some games.

I guess you could inquire about a few guys, but to spend any money probably makes little sense (counting out Oswalt, Lannan and the like). We are not gearing up for the playoffs this year, and like the rest of the way the team is constructed (as a catch bottled lightning and ride it out), someone internal may surprise.

My bet is one of Olsen or Young steps up...

IGT 4/27/12: Mets at Rockies (Schwinden/Pomeranz)

NYFSers Currently Online