Joined: Tue Sep 19, 2006 2:57 pm Posts: 82442 Location: New York, NY
Joefrompgh wrote:
This list already is becoming very depressing....
I went with Alonso and am hoping Anthony Kay is listed for the next round.....can always hope that Peterson and Kay could be #3 or #4 starters in a couple of years and since we have seen little or nothing from them yet, we cannot point out their poor performances yet (but yes, this is a real yawn....)
I actually do see a bright light coming from the DR...possibly a lot of B to C+ prospects in the works (unfortunetly no B+ or better,,..no standouts but some pretty good youngsters, with hope that some of them have decent ceilings). Need to replace Brooklyn's roster with the best from DR-2 and DR-1 rosters next year.
Kay nomination noted, he will replace the winner of this poll.
_________________ Twit-@Wexlerrules Instagram- @Wexlerrules Staunch anti-BADP (Batting average dependent players)
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:09 am Posts: 13064 Location: Somebody's stolen my avatar
Metro2007 wrote:
HeyNowHK wrote:
Metro2007 wrote:
Odd bodies- Chris Flexen and Phil Evans. Corey Taylor also struck me as looking like a beer leaguer when I saw him.
But Flex is like 6'4". Evans certainly doesn't have a great body and is clearly maxed out. Would be great if he dropped 10 lbs. Likewise there is no physical projection for Guillorme at 5'9" 200+.
Flexen IS 6'4 but he has a very odd build. He looks like a refrigerator or something. I'm not even saying odd bodies can't work, just noting ones that stand out.
And pitchers can more easily get away with it. (occasionally first basemen too).
_________________ Why is it a bad thing to lose touch with reality? Have you seen reality lately? It's terrible. - Stephen Colbert.
Joined: Sun Feb 17, 2008 2:09 am Posts: 13064 Location: Somebody's stolen my avatar
acerimusdux wrote:
I might be voting for Guillorme soon, but I think there's still a chance he hits a lot.
I just don't see his physical tools giving him a low ceiling there. And with his strong plate discipline and contact ability, he's going to continue to get opportunities. He's just not a Torvar or Tejada type who seems physically incabable of turning into a Dustin Pedroia or Justin Turner.
I like this post, and I could see voting for Guillorme ahead of, Dunn for example - in what many would call a stretch but not a huge stretch. I like him more than most.
I'd like him a lot better if BA or someone would give him top a top 20 league ranking. None of the prospect writers that I know of have stood behind him and they're supposed to know more than me, so that concerns me a bit, but I like the profile of contact hitter, draws walks and plus glove.
Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2008 8:01 am Posts: 24575 Location: Pittsburgh
jdawginsc wrote:
Ralf wrote:
I went
1. Gimenez 2. Vientos
Always partial to position player talent over pitchers that haven't reached at least AA and shown some success.
I missed the first poll, but I am:
Peterson Vientos Gimenez Szapucki Alonso Dunn James
etc...
I have to say that I agree on Gimenez. I can't help but see shades of Ruben Tejada when I read his write ups.
_________________ Baseball has a way of ripping your ❤️ out, stabbing it, putting it back in your chest, then healing itself just in time for Spring Training. - Thor
I wonder if any get honorable mention. Maybe I should ask this question in chat. "How hard did you guys laugh while discussing the Mets prospects?"
Who's our best prospect in Brooklyn? Rasquin? Medina (hitter not pitcher), The injured Matt Winaker? Worse than Binghamton in terms of prospects. There's just nothing there.
Brooklyn was pretty horrible and their record was well deserved. Walter Rasquin, however, as short as he is, may actually be a prospect.....
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
