NYFS ny mets message boards
http://www.nyfuturestars.com/community/

Who is #8
http://www.nyfuturestars.com/community/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=44727
Page 5 of 5

Author:  jdawginsc [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 6:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who is #8

What I saw in HS when the Mets first looked at him...some nasty stuff.

Author:  Hot Takes [ Thu Oct 12, 2017 7:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Who is #8

I think voting for Kay in this range is fair. You didn't need pro samples to know Conforto was one of our best prospects when we drafted him. We didn't see much of Peterson and picked him #2. Dunn is #6 purely on draft reports.

From draft reports, Kay sounds like he could be a fairly fast riser. No reason to object to him being here even if I voted Guillorme.

Author:  acerimusdux [ Fri Oct 13, 2017 12:13 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Who is #8

Hot Takes wrote:
I think voting for Kay in this range is fair. You didn't need pro samples to know Conforto was one of our best prospects when we drafted him. .

Well in addition, advanced college samples are more useful than low level rookie ball pro samples anyway. Alonso and Guillorme are really the only ones we've voted onto the list yet who have even played A+ or higher.

A few played in the SAL, but neither Gimenez or Lindsay were dominant there, and while Szapucki was, he only made 6 starts there. And they're already on the list. The guys who have played at higher levels just don't seem to have great ceilings. Your choices there now are guys like Cecchini, Nido, Oswalt, and Bashlor.

Page 5 of 5 All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/