when he's on , he is pretty unstoppable on offense
his small size allows him to penetrate past bigger players with relative ease ...and his freak athletic ability allows him to score upon the taller trees
(thats my walt clyde moment)
anyway , i would hope to get at least a late 1st round or early 2nd round pick ... a late 2nd round pick is pretty lame..
how about nate + our 38th pick for Boston's 25th pick
Joined: Tue May 01, 2007 4:44 pm Posts: 3455 Location: Philadelphia
bygranddesign wrote:
i think Nate would be a good player for boston
when he's on , he is pretty unstoppable on offense
his small size allows him to penetrate past bigger players with relative ease ...and his freak athletic ability allows him to score upon the taller trees
(thats my walt clyde moment)
anyway , i would hope to get at least a late 1st round or early 2nd round pick ... a late 2nd round pick is pretty lame..
how about nate + our 38th pick for Boston's 25th pick
I think I read the trade on the table is Nate for Eddie House and Bostons 1st rounder next year
when he's on , he is pretty unstoppable on offense
his small size allows him to penetrate past bigger players with relative ease ...and his freak athletic ability allows him to score upon the taller trees
(thats my walt clyde moment)
anyway , i would hope to get at least a late 1st round or early 2nd round pick ... a late 2nd round pick is pretty lame..
how about nate + our 38th pick for Boston's 25th pick
nah, Nate only cares about Nate. He's going to ruin KG's life by making him a babysitter
Why the hate for Nate? I don't get it and never have.
He's a good bench option.
Because he doesnt respect the game- which is all about TEAM.
I dont like selfish, showboaters with zero track record of winning. He acted like a 14 year old while he was a Knick. He may have been nice to fans, but showed no commitment to improving himself or his mates
Why the hate for Nate? I don't get it and never have.
He's a good bench option.
Because he doesnt respect the game- which is all about TEAM.
I dont like selfish, showboaters with zero track record of winning. He acted like a 14 year old while he was a Knick. He may have been nice to fans, but showed no commitment to improving himself or his mates
First of all you are wrong about Nate... Nate's game has improved 10 fold. Second of all you must hate almost ever player in the nba.
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:48 pm Posts: 4116 Location: Darlington County
Since it looks like T-Mac is coming here, let me ask the NBA guys on the forum a question. Let's say McGrady still has something left in the tank - you know, can put up 16 or 18 a game. Can the Knicks re-sign him and 2 big time guys (Bosh, Lebron)? I'm asking about the salary cap stuff specifically.
Joined: Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:56 pm Posts: 26103 Location: Danbury, CT
Genmet wrote:
Since it looks like T-Mac is coming here, let me ask the NBA guys on the forum a question. Let's say McGrady still has something left in the tank - you know, can put up 16 or 18 a game. Can the Knicks re-sign him and 2 big time guys (Bosh, Lebron)? I'm asking about the salary cap stuff specifically.
I wouldn't.
I'd sign Lee before TMac.
_________________
Locutus of Borg wrote:
I am Locutus of Borg. Resistance is futile. Your life, as it had been, is over. From this time forward, you will service, us.
No they barely have enough for 2 max free agents (barring a Curry buyout). We would likely have to fill the rest of the team out with cheap vets or try trading Curry's expiring deal for a better player with a longer deal.
Joined: Tue Dec 05, 2006 10:48 pm Posts: 4116 Location: Darlington County
tejdog1 wrote:
Genmet wrote:
Since it looks like T-Mac is coming here, let me ask the NBA guys on the forum a question. Let's say McGrady still has something left in the tank - you know, can put up 16 or 18 a game. Can the Knicks re-sign him and 2 big time guys (Bosh, Lebron)? I'm asking about the salary cap stuff specifically.
I wouldn't.
I'd sign Lee before TMac.
So, TMac being a Knick already doesn't give them carte blanche to pay him whatever they want? Isn't their some kind of Larry Bird rule?
Since it looks like T-Mac is coming here, let me ask the NBA guys on the forum a question. Let's say McGrady still has something left in the tank - you know, can put up 16 or 18 a game. Can the Knicks re-sign him and 2 big time guys (Bosh, Lebron)? I'm asking about the salary cap stuff specifically.
I wouldn't.
I'd sign Lee before TMac.
So, TMac being a Knick already doesn't give them carte blanche to pay him whatever they want? Isn't their some kind of Larry Bird rule?
Yea but you have to be with a team for a few years for that to work. And the amount of a bird rule goes against the cap until you renounce the bird rights to a player. So Lee counts against the cap for something like 10 plus million until we renounce his Bird rights.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum