Round 2 Rangers v. Pittsburgh

Your Icon · **Posted:** Sun May 04, 2008 3:26 pm

Somebody want to explain to me how Drury gets his face absolutely chopped up by Malone's stick (to the point where it took five minutes to clear the blood off the ice) and there's no penalty call?

champstark · **Joined:** Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:59 pm **Posts:** 6018

Your Icon wrote:

Somebody want to explain to me how Drury gets his face absolutely chopped up by Malone's stick (to the point where it took five minutes to clear the blood off the ice) and there's no penalty call?

They want the Pens to win because they think it will bring in more fans.

chinabox · **Posted:** Sun May 04, 2008 3:42 pm

champstark wrote:

Your Icon wrote:

Somebody want to explain to me how Drury gets his face absolutely chopped up by Malone's stick (to the point where it took five minutes to clear the blood off the ice) and there's no penalty call?

They want the Pens to win because they think it will bring in more fans.

These league-wide conspiracy theories are so hilarious, especially coming from fans of the biggest market team. I wouldn't watch a sport that I honestly believed that the refs weren't calling penalties because the league wanted a certain team to win.

sluger11787 · **Joined:** Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:27 pm **Posts:** 17097

Your Icon wrote:

Somebody want to explain to me how Drury gets his face absolutely chopped up by Malone's stick (to the point where it took five minutes to clear the blood off the ice) and there's no penalty call?

Refs missed it. It happens all the time.

Rozsival is one of the most undisciplined players in the NHL. I'd hate to have to watch him on my team...

Your Icon · **Posted:** Sun May 04, 2008 3:47 pm

i'd like to think the Rangers can come back here but... this looks like too big of a hole.

Why wasn't play stopped on the loose net?

I thought that was supposed to be instant? Would it have only stopped if the Rangers had touched the puck?

Well for the Rangers to win they have to get at least one back in this period.

Your Icon · **Posted:** Sun May 04, 2008 3:55 pm

Wait. So why did they decide to call off the penalty? It wasn't a mistaken whistle, you could hear the Ref say "too many men on the ice."

champstark · **Joined:** Mon Sep 18, 2006 9:59 pm **Posts:** 6018

chinabox wrote:

champstark wrote:

Your Icon wrote:

Somebody want to explain to me how Drury gets his face absolutely chopped up by Malone's stick (to the point where it took five minutes to clear the blood off the ice) and there's no penalty call?

They want the Pens to win because they think it will bring in more fans.

These league-wide conspiracy theories are so hilarious, especially coming from fans of the biggest market team. I wouldn't watch a sport that I honestly believed that the refs weren't calling penalties because the league wanted a certain team to win.

(says the Pens fan) :wink:

sluger11787 · **Joined:** Mon Sep 18, 2006 5:27 pm **Posts:** 17097

I'm pretty sure the net came up on its moorings but went back down and never actually came off.

Rangers are so undisciplined. With the amount of iron the Pens have struck on the power play today they're lucky it's not 4-0.

Your Icon · **Posted:** Sun May 04, 2008 4:14 pm

sluger11787 wrote:

I'm pretty sure the net came up on its moorings but went back down and never actually came off.

Rangers are so undisciplined. With the amount of iron the Pens have struck on the power play today they're lucky it's not 4-0.

I'm almost 100% sure it came completely off one of its moorings.

Your Icon · **Posted:** Sun May 04, 2008 4:22 pm

yes.yes.yes. omg yes.

2-2

Rufus · **Joined:** Tue Sep 19, 2006 4:41 pm **Posts:** 4708

BRAND NEW GAME BABY!

chinabox · **Posted:** Sun May 04, 2008 4:29 pm

I guess the NHL has called off the conspiracy!

Round 2 Rangers v. Pittsburgh

NYFSers Currently Online